I posted recently about WHY people out there in the big scary world of scriptwriting WON’T nick your script or idea. Whilst many writers reacted favourably in the blogosphere and Twitsville, I was still surprised by how many insisted I *had* to be wrong, sending me links to various cases where scripts have apparently been “stolen”.

But let’s break it down:

No personal experience? Interestingly, NOT ONE WRITER who sent me links mentioned they had had their work PERSONALLY stolen. Instead, they were sending me links to cases they had read about on the internet, most often on message boards. I always find it really interesting that writers, whom I often find to be those most LIKELY to challenge conspiracy theories in the news, etc, nevertheless entertain *this* one so readily.

The myth’s the same, but the stories have changed? When I first started script reading donkey’s years ago, the most oft-remarked upon case I personally came across was that of the Eddie Murphy film “Coming to America”. This time, it was instead the notion that a book by Sophia Stewart, “The Third Eye” had been stolen to create not only The Matrix Trilogy, but also the first part of the Terminator franchise. Needless to say I’m personally completely unconvinced – not least by Stewart’s assertions that The Wachowski brothers “couldn’t” have made up black characters like those in The Matrix (?) – but make sure you read the various posts for yourself, there’s even a documentary on Youtube.

Different for Big Fish? Several writers contacted me asking my thoughts on the notion of “influenced by…” and plagiarism, citing the Harlan Ellison case against James Cameron regarding the first Terminator film. I was not familiar with this case until recently because I am neither a Cameron nor Ellison fan though, so it would be wrong for me to comment directly on the ins-and-outs of the case. However personally I think there is a HUGE difference between paying homage to those stories and people that influence you and your storytelling and actual plagiarism. The difficulty then is defining the what separates the two. I suppose to cover one’s back it’s worth getting involved that person behind the story that influences your own. However, even if you don’t, I’m still not sure it contributes to the notion of actual “stealing”, because otherwise surely on that basis ALL elements of storytelling are stolen from something else because, as writers are quick to lament, “nothing is 100% original”. As I’ve always said on this blog, it’s the execution that counts.

Money Talks? Lots of stories on the internet talk of studios in particular “settling” with aggrieved writers over supposedly stolen scripts. Many writers who contacted me seemed to believe this constitutes an admission of guilt (from the articles it seems Sophia Stewart believes her initial offer does this too), but I think there’s another way of looking at it: why would a studio get caught up in a legal wrangle with a writer on a mission, when it can throw a little bit of money at the problem and make it go away? However, this no doubt adds fuel to the fire. But then, why would a big studio care? And the only loser in The Third Eye case appears to Stewart anyway. According to the article I linked to, she refused her settlement to apparently fight for ALL writers who’d had their ideas stolen… And where is she now?

So, despite a few Bang2writers’ best efforts, I’m afraid I STILL don’t believe scripts or ideas get stolen as a matter of course! And I’m basing this not on various stuff I’ve read or seen on the internet either, but on my direct, personal experience of reading scripts and being involved in script development for ten years, because basically it boils down to this:

I have never, ever, EVER seen OR heard a credible case of “script stealing” happen.

But anyway, don’t just take my word for it, check out these thoughts from other Bang2writers:

The Myth of Ideas Theft by Jared Kelly. Jared spent years and years working for Channel 4 here in the UK, so has read a HUGE stack of scripts.

A Few Words on Copyright By A Working Actor by Rob Talbot. Rob’s been in squllions of shorts and films, including my own, SAFE, nearly always playing the “creepy guy”! Many, many scripts have passed through Rob’s hands then and he’s dealt with a multitude of writers, directors and producers.

Amazon Studios are Evil! By “professional amateur writer” (his words not mine!) Antony Davies. Widening the margins a little here from JUST copyright, but lots of writers have asked me my thoughts on Amazon Studios and whether I think they might get “ripped off” by them too. Since I’ve not used Amazon Studios (and don’t plan to), I don’t feel I can comment OR recommend them, but Antony (despite the title of this blog post) is a keen advocate, so well worth a read if you’re thinking about taking the plunge there.

For B2W offers and free stuff first, join my EMAIL LIST

7 Responses to Copyright: A Follow Up

  1. Antony says:

    I should emphasise, anyone considering the Amazon route needs to know all the facts before taking that plunge. I only uploaded a script that a) I know I can live without for up to THREE YEARS, and b) it's something I know no "serious" indie would touch. If you have had a sniff of a deal I wouldn't advise it, but there is enough information out there for each of us to make an informed decision.

  2. Pete Darby says:

    And in the final stages of this "The idea is valuable, the execution is negligible" insanity… <http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AtLastWriterBewareBlogsAcCrispinAndVictoriaStraussRevealAll/~3/GiwxYYY9ORc/whats-idea-worth.html

  3. Lucy V says:

    OMG, that link is fab. Thanks Pete!

  4. Tom says:

    I can understand why people feel this way because copyright law appears to be quite elusive and tricky at times. I know of a couple of cases where people have successfully brought legal action to bear where they feel their work has been infringed but the main difference is that the infringed work has already been published.

    The two in question are Richard Stanley's Hardware (failed to credit it's source – an old 2000AD strip called Shok! which you can read online here and see how similar the stories are http://www.britishhorrorfilms.co.uk/shok.shtml ) and Dreamworks' "The Island" which led to a lawsuit from the makers of a 1979 film "Parts: The Clonus Horror" (read more here: http://www.agonybooth.com/agonizer/interview-with-clonus-screenwriter.aspx ) Dreamworks settled over Clonus for a substantial figure.

    Interestingly, at the time of The Island's pre-production, Dreamworks had an option on a book called "Spares" by Michael Marshall Smith and, allegedly, three of the producers involved with Spares were also involved with "The Island". The main conceit of Spares was about clones being used as spare parts – also the central idea behind the Ishiguro's book (and adapted film) "Never Let Me Go".

    Again, the difference here is that Clonus and The Island were so obviously similar (allegedly) and shared much more than a central idea that it could be construed that The Island was a remake (I've yet to see Clonus to give a personal opinion on this) in which case it could be argued that copyright was infringed. But that's more than just having a similar idea.

  5. Richard Cosgrove says:

    Another blast of common sense.

    About the Ellison/Cameron thing. Terminator was claimed to be based on an episode of the original The Outer Limits called Soldier by Ellison, which was also based on one of his short stories. There are some similarities in Terminator and Soldier (enemy soldiers travelling back in time, to continue their war), but there aren't any robots in Soldier, and no love story.

    Scott Myers on Go Into The Story has looked at the downside of Amazon Studios. He's also had a reply from Amazon Studios regarding complaints levelled at it.

  6. jazad says:

    Totally agree with your opinion on theft.
    'Divin't worry aboot it, pet,' as they say up here in the Toon.
    But if you believe in conspiracy theories, or just want another, alternative opinion on the subjec, check out this link about Senior Steilbergo. http://laveriteinterdi.theproductjudge.com/?p=1115

  7. Tom says:

    Thanks for that conspiracy link – straight to an anti-semitic site full of Teh Crazy.

    Also, it links back to the original article from another site without so much as a "Here's an article we took from another site written by someone else"

    Also also, it's crazy talk. Badly researched crazy talk at that.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>