NB. Since writing this post back in 09, it would appear one of the key advantages of paid-for software is it is not suddenly abandoned by its developer! 


Hello to the lovely Michelle who asks:

I’ve heard mixed advice from everyone on the screenwriting software issue… Some advise getting it, others say there’s no need for expensive software – at least not until you’re in the thick of it. Have been looking into FD and found reviews fared Movie Magic better. What’s your take ?

Well, obviously: end of the day, it’s your choice. Some people like screenwriting software; others see it as an excuse for a company to make shedloads of cash. That disclaimer aside however, I think you’re a mentalist if you don’t use *some sort* of screenwriting software. For one thing, it looks better on the page than manually formatted MS Word. It also takes a hell of a lot less time to hit “return” than it does to go back and painstakingly move the text about the page into the right place. What’s more, a script in MS Word is often that bit longer than your automatically-formatted screenplay, so your page count may go up and give you essentially a false reading of how long it really is.

So I’m a fan of screenwriting software, defo. But which one? Well again, that’s totally up to you. Here’s an overview of those software packages that have crossed the B2W desktop in the past ten years …

Free Software

CeltX. Lots of Bang2writers are big fans of CeltX. Of the free screenwriting software this is definitely my favourite, but it has limitations that get on my nerves, the biggest one being you have to be online to convert to PDF [UPDATE: It’s now 2013 and this has been rectified; CeltX is still the most popular free software of the Bang2writers]. I’m also not a big fan of the menus at the top: they don’t seem as well laid out logically-speaking as they could be. On a purely finnicky level, I don’t like the version of Courier CeltX has, it seems a bit weird in comparison to others.

BBC’s Script Smart. The second fave amongst them is the BBC’s Script Smart. I downloaded it once to try it and didn’t understand it. Nothing appeared to work – at least in the way I wanted it to and/or expected it to. Perhaps I got a dodgy download, ‘cos I appear to be the only person in the universe this has affected. Whatever the case, I didn’t like it and haven’t been back. [EDIT: No longer supported].

Scripped. Another one Bang2writers seem to like is Scripped, principally for its online collaboration feature (which CeltX also has). Whilst I applaud the idea, I’m simply not interested in online collaboration in this way. I gave the actual software a try and it seemed fine – but there appeared to be loads of stuff that I didn’t need/wasn’t interested in and though I still technically have an account, I haven’t opened it in yonks. [EDIT: GONE!! There was an EPIC data loss and users’ scripts got deleted, detailed HERE. Listen to John August’s  podcast with Scripped about it HERE. Something else to think on perhaps, re: freeware].

Sophocles. There was a brief interest in Sophocles amongst my Bang2writers and I took a look too: it seemed interesting, but by then I had already bought software. [EDIT: no longer supported].

Here are some more free screenwriting software that have turned up, since writing the post:

Script Buddy



Adobe Story

If you use any of the above, let me know what you think of them and I’ll add your thoughts to this post.

Paid For Software

Here’s 5 Screenwriting Software for under $50 from No Film School.

FADE IN Pro. This turned up in 2014 to VERY enthusiastic endorsements from the Bang2writers. They say its functionality is ace, the programmer is approachable (apparently someone asked for a radio template to be added and it was, almost immediately), plus it’s affordable at just $49.95. Check it out HERE.

Final Draft. I’ve been a Final Draft user now for aeons: it was the first I tried, but I was amazed by how easy it made everything (perhaps making the others seem like it was reinventing the wheel?). Granted, Final Draft 7 had some annoying bugs, but I’ve been using Final Draft 8 now since it came out and I’m pleased to report that I have had no problems whatsoever, plus it has some great new features too. What’s more, everyone I know and work with regularly uses Final Draft: we don’t have to worry about converting files, we can just attach and “send”, no faffing about. Since I am allergic to faffing and want to do everything RIGHT NOW OR BUST, this floats my boat.

Someone said to me once that Final Draft is the professional’s choice. Certainly, I have never sat in a meeting – with anyone – and been asked, “Do you use Final Draft?”, it’s just a given. All the professional clients I read for use Final Draft; as a reader/editor I would be at a disadvantage if I didn’t have it. After PDF, FDR is the file I get most. On a purely finnicky level again, I find Courier Final Draft the neatest and easiest to read out of ALL the courier fonts.

Of course, the downside is Final Draft is bloody expensive. It’s also not great for radio plays and as for creating new format templates you might need, forget it – I tried once and nearly had a severe brain explosion. But of all the major formatting tools available, I think it’s easiest to use, most convenient, most universal and best looking on the actual page.

Movie Magic. Of the paid-for software, about three million years ago I tried Movie Magic. I didn’t like it. Everything seemed to be in the wrong place, though I accept that’s a personal thing. What’s more, since I didn’t seem to know anyone who used Movie Magic, I couldn’t just send people a MM file. This seemed a good enough reason not to buy it and I haven’t lived to regret it; in the past 5 years only ONE Bang2writer has sent me an MM file. When I asked him to convert it because I couldn’t open those files, the text on the page went absolutely ballistic. [EDIT: I have no clue whether this has been rectified; in the last four/five years, no one has sent me another MM file, leading me to believe it just never really caught on in the UK maybe?].

What’s your choice of software and why?


Since writing this post, it would appear one of the key advantages of paid-for software is it is not suddenly abandoned by its developer! 

Over on Twitter (follow me to join in!), my mighty tweeps are making the following recommendations:

Apparently Scrivener is ace. I’ve never used this, so can’t say one way or another, but it’s a paid-for software costing $39.95 and of course you can have a trial first to find out if you like it. Downside: it’s only available to Mac users at present. [2013 UPDATE: Now available for Windows as well].

Others are recommending Writers Cafe as well as Allen here, principally for its “storylines” function. I’ve heard mixed tales about this software and I took a look a while back and it didn’t appeal to me, but that doesn’t mean it’s not worth a go, especially if you find outlining a real pain.

Apparently Movie Magic give existing Final Draft users a discount!

Meanwhile, over at Facebook, there is MUCH love for both Final Draft and CeltX too, with just a couple recommending Movie Magic – I wonder why it hasn’t caught on over here? Our American cousins seem to use it more.

Join Bang2writers on Facebook or search “Bang2writers” on LinkedIn.

Like This Post?

PsulitHyThen check out my screenwriting books, available in eBook and paperback from Amazon and all good book stores. Click the pics or to look inside Writing & Selling Drama Screenplays, CLICK HERE.



CLICK HERE to read an excerpt from Writing & Selling Thriller Screenplays about the iconic character of Driver in the movie DRIVE, courtesy of B2W friends Film Doctor. Click on the pic or HERE, to look inside in the front of the book.


For B2W offers and free stuff first, join my EMAIL LIST

31 Responses to Which Screenwriting Software Is The Best? (Paid For & Free)

  1. Allen O'Leary says:

    Final Draft is good. I use something called Montage on my Mac and it's good to and much cheaper :-) I got by for the first fifteen years (writing plays mostly) using Word and setting up keyboard macros which I have to say was just fine too (I think thats essentially what the BBC Word thingie does). In the end special writing software is just FASTER and less hassle.

    There is also the important step of investing money in your career. As a director there are all manner of toys to buy (like cameras!) but the screenwriter is stuck with conferences, books and software. Buying First Draft or whatever feels like you are making a commitment to your career – and this may be the most important aspect of buying screenwriting software :-)

    The key thing for me is that I only use these programs to actually write as their outlining and notes tools I find a bit restrictive. The only thing I have found which is useful here is a program called 'Wrtiers Cafe' most of which is useless but it has a part called 'Storylines' which is just brilliant for me – there's a big screenshot of it in action on this page: http://www.agoodstorywelltold.com/click/124/0 And it's made by one guy who lives in the UK who is very helpful. So that's my tip for the day :-)

  2. Pete Darby says:

    My main complaint at the moment is… why is it such and unholy bastard to get ANY of these programs to properly read the file formats of any of the others? Like the writing tools of FD, but for small unit production (and radio and comic formats) Celtx appeals. Moving a working script from one to the other? Fecking nightmare.

    Even MS Office realised this a decade ago; file imports from your rival's applications INCREASE THE DESIRABILITY OF YOUR APPLICATIONS.

  3. katiemccullough says:

    I tried to use Final Draft whilst at uni at it seriously did my head in. The chances are it probably wouldn't now but as everyone knows it's a damn sight expensive. Now if I'm writing screenplays I use Pages on my Mac as it has a template already set up for screenplays and even has a storyboard template too. You can set up tab keys to automatically get it to recognise what you're writing and works just fine for me.

    My bosses rave about Scrivener and find that it works perfectly for them. They do have Final Draft banging around the office but as you've mentioned what pleases one person irritates another.

    I wholeheartedly agree with Allen about making that decision to pay money for something like this, it's a self assurance of "this is what I want to do". I felt the same way about having 'screenwriter and playwright' alongside my name on a business card. It was a big decision but an important one nonetheless, however frivolous it may seem at the time.

  4. Piers says:

    Unfortunately the level of funding (none) means that Script Smart hasn't been in development for some years now, so it doesn't work on newer operating systems or versions of Word.

    By "newer" I mean anything from Vista and OSX onwards, and Word 2007/2008. Which I suspect is your problem.

    Sophocles also, I believe, isn't supported by the author any longer.

  5. Paul Campbell says:

    Final Draft 8 (though I often end up converting the stuff and sending it out in FD7 or PDF).

    It's more stable than FD7, and has some nifty new scene analysis stuff.

    More importantly, it's what the client wants. In my limited career writing stuff for the Beeb, I have had no choice but to use Final Draft for Casualty, Holby City and EastEnders. It's what they use, so it's what I used. Doctors uses Word for some reason.

  6. Iain Coleman says:

    You're not the only one to have struggled with Script Smart. I tried it a couple of years ago, and found it a right pain in the bum. Switching to Celtx was such a relief.

  7. Piers says:

    I'm trying to get celtx to provide templates for standard BBC radio formats. They're interested, but it's not a priority.

    A polite email to them, if you're a celtx user, might help to establish demand…

  8. M J says:

    I like Movie Magic – still getting used to it but it seems relatively user-friendly, and has lots of useful templates. I never send out MM files though – I just convert to a pdf, and so far noone's had a problem with those. Have tried Final Draft, but feel like I'd need a while to get used to it – maybe in the future!

  9. Lucy V says:

    Paul – yes, it defo seems to be the industry choice, though as you say there is the odd show here and there that still uses Word and I always find it surprising. Hollyoaks has its own Word-style format.

    Piers – I heard too Sophocles was "gone", though it still seems to be there, available to download… But presumably they mean it's just never ever going to have an update? Getting CeltX to help out Script Smart seems a good idea, will pass that info on to other people asking for sure.

    Katie – I have just looked on my Mac and I have Pages! I never knew it could double as screenwriting software (in fact I didn't even know I had it). I have never opened it before today, will give it a try.

    MJ – the MM file I got turned into some sort of werid txt file: perhaps this was before the PDF function existed or perhaps the chap in question simply got it wrong. I could read it *just about* but needless to say it was very distracting!

  10. Gary Bainbridge says:

    I find Final Draft a trifle unwieldy. Celtx's stripped down functionality is much more to my taste, even with the online PDF restriction.

  11. Rach says:

    I think it really depends on how your mind works. I have used Script Smart for years, and still do for Radio. It gets a bit quirky at times but working with a range of software applications for a few decades now means I can sort problems out for myself.

    I treated myself to Final Draft this year after saving Xmas and birthday money. I'd got to the point where I felt limited with word templates, especially with diagnosing and editing a feature script. I could have probably gone on for quite a while but irritation won.

    Dave and I both had a go at quite a few of them (free and expensive). We prefer to choose for ourselves rather than going with what everyone else is using.

    None were perfect so in the end it was a case of which did we find least irritating.

    What you can live with will be a personal preference so I think spending the time trying them out is worth the effort. The expensive ones do have free trial copies you can download.

  12. IanT says:

    I'm probably one of the people who was saying that Scrivener was ace on Twitter.

    Let me restate – it's ace. As you say, shame it's Mac-only, but it's good enough for me to abandon the PC for it. :-)

    It's not designed specifically for screenwriting — it started out for fiction — but has had screenwriting support added in later versions.

    It supports hotkeys to switch into different typing 'modes' (i.e. character, scene header, dialogue etc.) and is fairly intelligent about what mode you want to be in at any given point. I've used Final Draft a bit too (years ago, though), and the support seemed similar.

    A lot of Scrivener is about structuring – it lets you juggle about story cards, take notes, all that sort of thing, and then expand those notes into full scenes.

    It also exports and imports to Final Draft 8, which is nice.

    (And no, I don't work for them. :-) Scrivener is a one-man outfit, and that man isn't me…)

  13. Eric says:

    wow! thanks for another great blog post!
    Customized application development

  14. wellywood woman says:

    I am so happy whenever I open Final Draft that I've never considered any other programme (fortunately go it cheaply when a student). I hear someone mention Final Draft, or I read the words "Final Draft" and my whole body just goes AAAAH (replaces meditation really). I love its simplicity. It's so much more straightforward than Word which I use a lot for other stuff.

  15. Ian says:

    Sophocles – because it can do Cue and Dialogue on the same line, so play and radio formats are easy. (For BBC radio sketches with FX and Grams, it still easier to just use Word.)

    Also, easy choice of what you want to print – so can leave out transitions on a spec script.

    Only problem is nobody else uses it, but the export to pdf is fine.

  16. Jim Moon says:

    If you are looking to submit to the BBC and have Windows, Practical Scriptwriter is certainly worth a look.

    Very easy to use and is still being actively developed. I just downloaded version 2 which is a completely new program, at no extra charge.

  17. Stephan says:

    Let me also add my support for Scrivener, which is now available for Windows too. It’s great for plotting and structuring and also exports and imports FDR and FDX files.

    • Lucy V Hay says:

      Thanks Stephen, I’ve updated the post with that info too. Have heard only good things about Scrivener, so will definitely give it a try.

  18. I agree, Lucy. I reviewed the principal available software a few years ago and Final Draft definitely came up on top for me. I’ve always used it since. However, I’m now playing with Scrivener and it’s great for organising. I’ve not yet used it to write a script but it seems to do the job. But it doesn’t do what FD does so nicely, and suggest locations, speakers, etc just by typing the first letter. Maybe I’m lazy, but I do like that. It helps me stay in the flow.

    On the other hand, if you don’t want the hassle, you can format the paragraph styles for free in Word, etc. You can even set them up so that the format for a character name automatically moves on to the paragraphy style for dialogue, etc.

    If anyone wants a pre-set template to do this, I’ve uploaded one to Euroscript – http://www.euroscript.co.uk/script-formats-and-free-downloads.html

  19. Rachael Howard says:

    Updated comment@ I started out using Script Smart. I was able to go into it and sort some of the bugs myself. But in the end I created my own Word Templates for Radio and Theater.
    Eventually I splashed out on FD and have used it for quite a few years now. Did test the others but FD was more intuitive for me. Others may have brains that work differently and prefer others. Personally I really didn’t like Celtx. I use FD for TV and Film.
    Recently become a Scrivener convert and love it. Great for working on ideas, storylining, character studies, research. I do most of my work now in Scrivener and only shift to FD or Word for the actual write.

    • Hi Rachel

      I’ve fallen for Scrivener, but not yet used the script format facility. Have you? It seems pretty good for laying out screenplays, but does it work for a full length script?

  20. I used Final Draft for a while and really liked it (this must have been 5 or 6, if there were such things, because it was long, long ago in a galaxy quite far away…) and I have used CeltX quite happily too. My favourite was a short lived Word MOd called “Magic Ant”. Ludicrous as it sounds, it was brilliant. It filled out character names and did all the formatting AND it had an “Insert joke” button, where you pressed it and it stuck in a joke. Not a good joke, or particularly appropriate to the context, but still… I like to think the inventor was anticipating the phone app credo of “You don’t need this, but we’re the only ones who do it.”
    By the way, I have yet to garner any success from my screenplays, but that’s primarily due to my laziness in not taking Lucy’s excellent advice.

  21. Ian Martin says:

    I’ve been lucky enough to have worked for Final Draft so I’ve never had to pay for it. I always recommend Celtx to people though if they are just dipping their toe into screenwriting and don’t want to spend a lot of money and decide it’s not for them.

  22. Darwin says:

    After using FD for years I got tired of the developers’ attitude. The latest release doesn’t feel like they had working screenwriters beta-testing it.

    Have done a 180 for simplicity with Fountain markdown. Can use any plain-text editor then bring it into Highland (by screenwriter John August), for example, or Slugline. I’m finding the zen simplicity of Fountain to be refreshing.


    Another one to look at is Logline, new but with considerable potential, especially regarding structure: logline app.com

  23. George Washington says:

    Here’s a free template for Apple Pages: http://story-architect.com/?p=3397

  24. User says:

    This article has many of the top screenwriting software packages MISSING.

    There is no reason to use any other free software, as WriterDuet is superior in everything the other packages do, for free.

    Highland and Slugline are also excellent, Mac only and are around $30.

    Paid: WriterDuet has a paid version for just under $70

    As noted, Fade In Pro is excellent. At $50, and doesn’t crash like Final Draft with excellent developer support, that’s my personal choice.

    The days where people say you either have to use Final Draft or Movie Magic because they are the industry standard are long over. They are basically the horse drawn carriage riders complaining that everyone is driving cars these days.

  25. Anna Casadei says:

    Every time I use Final Draft, it crashes. I had a writing partner who insisted on FD. After FD crashed, and I lost 30 pages, I never used it again.

    When I went to UCLA, we all used Movie Magic. I’ve been using it ever since, without regret. It has an excellent notes feature that makes life so much easier.

  26. Final Draft has always been the best but it is a bit buggy sometimes I find – and the design is a bit MacOS9. Fade In Pro is pretty exciting as it seems cleaner and more modern somehow (only used it for an hour) and seems to have some added functionality (like having a dim-able background for instance) that I imagine come from the creator being a writer. I think rather than the upgrade to FD10 from 9 (when it comes out) I MIGHT move over then. – might not though as FD is definitely industry standard.

  27. Edwina Tyrrell says:


    Has anyone tried amazon storyteller? looks like a great step in between script and final piece. i haven’t tried it myself yet but wondered if there is any interest out there?

  28. Edwina Tyrrell says:

    *I meant Amazon Storywriter

  29. Earl H. says:

    Decades ago I started trying several all kinds of inexpensive word processors thinking I could tweek them into submission, but then I said, for all the money I’ve spent I could have already paid for DOS ScriptThing. I was totally satisfied with the purchase which was always solid. ScriptThing eventually became Movie Magic which still remains my all-time favorite! The only things I sort wish it had is Linux support. (Although it does run well in Wine – Mint 17, I have this fear that one day one of these Linux or MM updates might cause some serious problems). A mobile app would be a nice along with the ability to import/output FDX files, (which is supposed to happen in a 2016 update). My curiosity has lead me to other software over the last few years, I really liked Celtx, but it wasn’t WYSIWYG and now have discontinued support for their Desktop! (I don’t like the online version and refuse to pay for subscriptions). Fade In Pro is pretty darn good and stable with great tech support, plus it runs on all OS platforms and get regular updates! I’m using it to write a stage play and sitcom pilot now. I’ve heard too many unsatisfied customers/horror stories and about Final Draft! Sure Movie Magic Screenwriter 6 may look a little outdated, but it gets the job done!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>