As human beings we measure ourselves and others by success or condition. It makes sense to us psychologically: we like to pigeon hole things, create a sense of order in an otherwise somewhat random world. Yet so often we make arbitrary assumptions about ourselves or other people based on what they have – or don’t have. It’s crazy when you think of it: why isn’t he married? (Because he’s unlovable). Why is she married? (Because she’s a doormat). Why does he work in a bar? (Because he’s lazy). Why didn’t she go to university? (Because she’s stupid). Though we are all guilty of doing this, if challenged (even by just ourselves), we can accept readily that it’s a load of a guff and we move on from that daft assumption… To another one. But it’s progress of a kind, at least.

Writers on the other hand will often judge themselves by these harsh standards – and stand by them no matter what anyone says or does. Rejections are justly deserved; options, placements in contests, meetings with agents and producers are nothing much – you heard people saying that? “Well I have a meeting/placement/whatever…” BUT IT WON’T COME TO ANYTHING. In fact, us writerly lot are so self deprecating that I’ve heard AWARD AWINNING SCREENWRITERS say they are “only” a writer – “My wife is the real hero,” one said to me once, “She’s a teacher.” I said to him: “I’m a writer AND a teacher – does that mean I’m half crap and half not?” The writer in question had had several Jacks and coke, so pondered for a moment and said, simply: “Yes.”

There’s been a lot online recently about writers “not meaning shit” in the industry: whilst there have been many voices chiming in on the unfairness of it all, very few threads that I have seen have addressed WHY this is. Julian Friedman made the good point on Shooting People’s screenwriters’ bulletin a couple of weeks’ back that not enough writers network properly or know enough about the industry to be taken seriously by it (hence them being in such low regard) – yet it seemed to me people were so busy moaning their lot that no one seemed to stop and say: “Actually, if I was at ANOTHER place of work and could only do HALF my work (ie. the bit I like, ignoring the bits I don’t like or don’t understand), wouldn’t I be considered the crappest employee there?” After all, just as screenwriting is only part of the filmmaking business, only part of screenwriting is the actual writing. A screenwriter should be able to network, be able to set him or herself goals, be able to understand contracts, know what’s happening in the industry, be able to liaise with agents, producers, give and take constructive criticism, take decent meetings. You can’t just shut yourself away in a room and emerge with a masterpiece, we all know that – but once a writer has that masterpiece and believes in it, it would seem it’s expected that all the other pieces somehow slot into place.

They don’t.

So if writers are treated like shit in this industry (and they can be), ask yourself why: is it because there’s a secret evil cabal of producers, agents and the like plotting the downfall of the poor, innocent writer?

Or is it because the writer does not value what they do enough?

So next time you’ve “just” got through the first round of the BSSC or “only” met with an agent or producer to discuss your idea or script, realise that you are underselling yourself and your talent and your ability. Realise that you can take the power back: you don’t like producers? So produce and/or direct your short yourself. It’s not the same because you are a hybrid, the hallowed writer-producer or writer-director, we’re not the same as THE OTHERS (if that helps). Read all the blogs, find out what’s going on, join the useful places, discard those that aren’t useful (but find out why, don’t rely on hearsay). Find out more about legal stuff. But most of all, don’t be afraid to shake people’s hands and say, “I’m a writer.” instead of “I’m just a writer.” or “I’m only the writer.” If people ask your ideas or opinions, there’s no need to be abrasive – but there’s no need to apologise either. Realise you can’t climb every rung of the ladder at once. Some days it will be three or four up; other times it will seem like you’re taking monster steps back. Other times – and these are the worst I feel – you stay in the same place, with nothing on the horizon. But give it time. Things will move eventually, it’s the law of the universe if nothing else.

So: be your own biggest fan, give yourself time and know what you’re doing because THAT’S when it all slots into place. Eventually ; )

Please press the buttons at the bottom to share the page on your social media profiles and/or check out my books. Thanks!

9 Responses to Be Your Own Biggest Fan… But Know What You’re Doing Too

  1. MJ says:

    That made me want to cheer – hurrah!

  2. Glenn Upsall says:

    I AM cheering!! “I’m BRILLIANT, me!!” Yay!!!

  3. Elinor says:

    Timely encouragement.

  4. Rach says:

    The last writing course I attended was run by a Director. She started by going round the table and asking…

    “What are you working on?” OK so that’s easy to answer. Then “When will it be made by?” At that point she would get “I hope…” or “Maybe it might…”

    Instant response was “Start again. Sit up. Look me in the eye and state the completion date.”

    Her point was that if we didn’t believe in our work then why would a Director or Producer. Act with confidence, even if you have to fake it.

  5. Lucy says:

    A very good point Rach – if we act like we don’t believe in our scripts, why would money men want to invest? It would be like going into Dragons’ Den and saying, “Well, this isn’t really any good, but…”

  6. SK says:

    Careful now. Much more of this and you’ll be starting to sound American.

  7. Eleanor says:

    Words of wisdom, as always.

  8. Sal says:

    Good article, Lucy – am cheering myself on as I type! But seriously – yes, we should do as you say, and value our skills. At least in theatre, the writer is valued as they should be – why can’t it be similar in film?

  9. SK says:

    I thought that schmoozing was not part of a writer’s job description (or at least, not as much) in the theatre?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>